A few years ago the cooperation between development and cybersecurity was minimal. Development teams would hand their code to the security, and security would return it with a very structured set of handoffs for the dev team. That is not sensible for the manner in which we work today, especially with fast-paced development projects like mobile app security developments.
The cycle of developing and updating mobile applications is faster than ever. Understandably, there is a lot of pressure and responsibility on the developers. Their performance is measured in completely different units than cybersecurity and safety. However, especially at larger companies, security, compliance and risk triggers still drive development requirements.
Regardless of anything else, who is liable for the security, at any rate? As per GitLab’s overview of more than 4,000 developers, 49% of security experts battle to get engineers to focus on vulnerabilities a priority. More terrible still, 68% of security experts feel less than half of app developers can spot security weaknesses later in the life cycle. On the software engineer’s side, almost 70% said that they’re relied upon to compose secure code, despite the fact that they get little direction or help.
If both parties represent different priorities and values, where is the common ground where they meet? How can communication and collaboration be improved?
1. Developers need to gain cybersecurity skills.
The importance of cybersecurity is not an issue, but unfortunately even the most famous software development schools and courses have not included software security in their curriculum. If software developers don’t get the right insight into a particular field of software security, they can’t even be expected to build a secure code.
That is the reason why on-the-job on secure coding preparing is vital for versatile application designers. Secure coding assists groups with incorporating security into the advancement cycle and strengthen it through the lifecycle of a mobile application (SSDLC, secure software development lifecycle). These aptitudes additionally help to overcome any issues between security groups and engineers, where there’s regularly a mutual arrangement of obligations to execute on (see more on that theme in the following area).
Tip: Top 10 Secure Coding Practices by Carnegie Mellon University
2. A culture of shared responsibility needs to be introduced
AppDev or AppSec? Who is responsible for secure final software development? Good question, but based on GitLab’s survey the appropriate response should be: both!
This is called a company culture of shared responsibility. It implies coders to work together with cybersecurity professionals. Collaboration based on SSDLC means, that the security is a part of the software development process and not just a part of the code which is added to the main code later. The part of this collaboration is when the developer and security teams routinely meet on the best way to address new requirements.
3. Establish repeatable and automated development processes
The above-mentioned collaboration between the two teams will create a proactive reaction for security concerns. This will help to develop a cost-effective and more secure development processes. On the market, there are many developer tools which support automation of security processes into development lifecycle (CI/CD, continuous integration and continuous delivery).
Tip: With App-Ray, you can secure your applications by integrating vulnerability analysis into your building process.
As a final word
The goal is to create an environment where application security is not characterized by tension, but rather is built into the development process as a priority. All this with the aim that security does not react to external events (eg hacker attacks), but proactively prepares for possible incidents.